You know your numbers. You are guessing at theirs.

Name the accounts you compete with and their posts collect on a schedule: what they shipped, when, and how it landed, charted against your own. No tab-checking, no scraping, no folder of screenshots you never look at again.

Their posting cadence and engagement, next to yours
Collected on a schedule, not when you remember to look
Read through your own connected accounts. Nothing you could not see yourself.
Any post they shipped can become a source you write from
The cost of tracking this by hand

Competitive research that lives in browser tabs is research you do not do.

You check their account when you remember, which is when you are already anxious about your own numbers. That is the worst possible sampling schedule.

You know they post more than you. You do not know whether it works. Volume and engagement are different questions, and only one of them should change your plan.

The format that worked for them three months ago is invisible now, because nothing kept a record. You are looking at their last five posts and calling it a trend.

Is this for you?

Honest fit check

For you if

  • You have three to ten accounts you actually watch and never watch consistently.
  • You want to know whether a format is working before you commit a quarter to it.
  • You report to someone who asks how you compare.

Not for you if

  • You want share-of-voice across the whole open web, ad spend estimates, or paid keyword data. This tracks organic social posts on the networks you have connected.
  • You want to track private accounts. If you cannot see it with your own credentials, neither can this.
  • You want an alert the second a rival posts. Collection runs on a schedule, not in real time.
What's inside

Their strategy, on the same axis as yours.

The point is not to copy anyone. It is to know whether the thing you are worried about is real before you rebuild your content plan around a feeling.

Cadence and engagement, charted

How often each tracked account posts and what it earns, over 7, 30, or 90 days. Your own numbers sit on the same chart, so the comparison needs no mental arithmetic.

Collected on a schedule

Polling runs on its own queue, so competitor collection never competes with publishing for rate budget. You open the page and the history is already there.

Their best posts, surfaced

The posts that outperformed their own average rise to the top, so you see the format that is working rather than the last thing they happened to publish.

Turn a post into a source

A competitor post can be filed as a source, which means the composer and the agent can write your own angle from it without you retyping anything.

Read with your own credentials

Everything is fetched through the accounts you connected. There is no scraping, no third-party data broker, and nothing you could not have opened in a browser yourself.

Stays inside the workspace

What is collected for one workspace never crosses into another, in any form. Stop tracking an account and its collected posts are deleted, not archived.

How it works

From a name to a chart

01

Name the accounts

Add a competitor by their handle on a network you have connected. There is nothing to install and no access to request from them.

02

Collection starts

Their posts collect on a schedule on a dedicated queue. The first pass fills in recent history so the page is useful immediately rather than in a fortnight.

03

Read the comparison

Cadence, engagement, and top posts over 7, 30, or 90 days, with your own accounts on the same axis. Change the range and everything recomputes.

04

Act on it

File the post worth answering as a source, and write your own version in the composer or hand it to the agent. Stop tracking anyone at any time and their collected posts go with them.

vs the alternatives

Why this beats a folder of screenshots.

Three ways teams keep an eye on the competition. Two of them quietly stop happening after the first busy week.

Checking their profile manually

What most people do

  • Happens when you are anxious, not on a schedule.
  • No history, so you cannot see a trend.
  • Nothing to compare against your own numbers.

A dedicated listening suite

What enterprise teams buy

  • Priced for a marketing department, not a small team.
  • Weeks of setup before the first useful chart.
  • Often relies on scraped data of uncertain provenance.
  • Lives apart from where you actually publish.
FoPost

FoPost competitor tracking

What you actually want

  • Add a handle, get history on a schedule.
  • Charted next to your own accounts, same screen as your analytics.
  • Read through your own connected accounts, never scraped.
  • A competitor post becomes a source you write from in one click.

Publishes to all major networks

Frequently asked questions

Do they know I am tracking them?

No. Their posts are public content read through your own connected accounts, the same way any follower reads them. Nothing is sent to the account you track and nothing appears on their side.

Which platforms does it cover?

The networks where you have an account connected and where the platform exposes another account's public posts through its official API. If a network does not offer that, it cannot be tracked here, and we will not scrape it to fake the feature.

How far back does the history go?

The first collection pulls the recent history the platform will return, then history accrues from the moment you add the account. It gets more useful the longer an account stays tracked.

What happens when I stop tracking someone?

Polling stops immediately and the posts collected for them are deleted. Adding them again later starts collection fresh rather than restoring the old set.

Can the agent read competitor data?

Yes, within the workspace it belongs to. Ask the FoPost Agent what a tracked account has been shipping and it uses the same tools the dashboard does, under the same permissions.

Does this count as AI usage?

Collection and charting do not. Asking the AI to write something from a competitor post is billed as AI usage, like any other AI action, because that is the part that runs a model.